~ / search / GHSA-2h44-x2wx-49f4

GHSA-2h44-x2wx-49f4

Potential HTTP policy bypass when using header rules in Cilium

Source: GitHub Advisory Database (reviewed) Moderate CVE-2023-30851

Packages

EcosystemPackageAffectedFixed in
Go github.com/cilium/cilium < 1.11.16 1.11.16
Go github.com/cilium/cilium >= 1.12.0, < 1.12.9 1.12.9
Go github.com/cilium/cilium >= 1.13.0, < 1.13.2 1.13.2

Details

As written in the advisory (Markdown source, shown as plain text).

### Impact This issue only impacts users who: - Have a HTTP policy that applies to multiple `toEndpoints` AND - Have an allow-all rule in place that affects only one of those endpoints In such cases, a wildcard rule will be appended to the set of HTTP rules, which could cause bypass of HTTP policies. ### Patches This issue has been patched in Cilium 1.11.16, 1.12.9, and 1.13.2. ### Workarounds Rewrite HTTP rules for each endpoint separately. For example, if the initial rule looks like: ``` egress: - toEndpoints: - matchLabels: k8s:kind: echo - matchLabels: k8s:kind: example toPorts: - ports: - port: "8080" protocol: TCP rules: http: - method: "GET" ``` It should be rewritten to: ``` egress: - toEndpoints: - matchLabels: k8s:kind: echo toPorts: - ports: - port: "8080" protocol: TCP rules: http: - method: "GET" - toEndpoints: - matchLabels: k8s:kind: example toPorts: - ports: - port: "8080" protocol: TCP rules: http: - method: "GET" ``` ### Acknowledgements The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @jrajahalme for investigating and fixing the issue. ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on [Slack](https://docs.cilium.io/en/latest/community/community/#slack). As usual, if you think you found a related vulnerability, we strongly encourage you to report security vulnerabilities to our private security mailing list: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) - first, before disclosing them in any public forums. This is a private mailing list where only members of the Cilium internal security team are subscribed to, and is treated as top priority.

References

External links from the advisory. They lead to third-party sites.