GHSA-f9qv-j5g6-g5cr
Trac is vulnerable to improper policy checks and missing 'raw' role check in docutils
Packages
Details
As written in the advisory (Markdown source, shown as plain text).
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Trac before 0.11.6 have unknown impact and attack vectors, possibly related to (1) "policy checks in report results when using alternate formats" or (2) a "check for the 'raw' role that is missing in docutils < 0.6."
References
External links from the advisory. They lead to third-party sites.
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-4405
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542394
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/54983
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/trac/PYSEC-2009-7.yaml
- https://web.archive.org/web/20130417170303/http://secunia.com/advisories/37901
- https://web.archive.org/web/20130513235205/http://secunia.com/advisories/37807
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-December/msg01169.html
- http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/tags/trac-0.11.6/RELEASE