GHSA-gcv9-6737-pjqw
SSRF vulnerability in jupyter-server-proxy
Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | jupyter-server-proxy | < 3.2.1 | 3.2.1 |
Details
As written in the advisory (Markdown source, shown as plain text).
### Impact
**What kind of vulnerability is it?** Server-Side Request Forgery ( SSRF )
**Who is impacted?** Any user deploying Jupyter Server or Notebook with jupyter-proxy-server extension enabled.
A lack of input validation allowed authenticated clients to proxy requests to other hosts, bypassing the `allowed_hosts` check. Because authentication is required, which already grants permissions to make the same requests via kernel or terminal execution, this is considered low to moderate severity.
### Patches
_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_
Upgrade to 3.2.1, or apply the patch https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/compare/v3.2.0...v3.2.1.patch
### For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
* Open a topic [on our forum](https://discourse.jupyter.org)
* Email the Jupyter security team at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])
References
External links from the advisory. They lead to third-party sites.
- https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/security/advisories/GHSA-gcv9-6737-pjqw
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-21697
- https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/commit/fd31930bacd12188c448c886e0783529436b99eb
- https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy
- https://github.com/jupyterhub/jupyter-server-proxy/compare/v3.2.0...v3.2.1.patch
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/jupyter-server-proxy/PYSEC-2022-16.yaml