GHSA-gjrg-jjr3-56cm

### Summary GoBGP contains a BGP OPEN capability parsing issue where several concrete capability decoders may parse data from the full remaining capability buffer instead of the slice bounded by the declared capability length, `CapLen`. A malformed BGP OPEN message can cause bytes from a following capability to be interpreted as part of the current capability. The most security-relevant case is the 4-octet AS capability, where a capability with `CapLen == 0` may cause the parser to read bytes from the following capability as the 4-octet AS value. This parsed value may later affect peer AS validation during BGP session establishment. ### Details The issue is in the BGP OPEN capability parser under: - `pkg/packet/bgp/bgp.go` - `pkg/packet/bgp/validate.go` - The BGP OPEN optional parameter capability format includes a capability code, a capability length field, and a capability value. Each concrete capability decoder should only parse bytes inside the declared capability value boundary. In affected versions, the generic capability parser records the declared `CapLen`, but several concrete capability decoders continue parsing from the full remaining capability buffer after advancing past the two-byte capability header. Conceptually, the vulnerable pattern is: ```go data = data[2:] // decoder reads from data without first limiting it to CapLen ### PoC The following parser-level proof of concept demonstrates the issue without requiring a full BGP session or a running `bgpd` instance. The malformed capability uses: - Capability Code: `65` (`BGP_CAP_FOUR_OCTET_AS_NUMBER`) - Declared `CapLen`: `0` - Four following bytes: `00 00 fd e8` Although the capability declares an empty value, affected versions parse the following four bytes as the 4-octet AS value `65000`. ### Impact A remote peer that can send a malformed BGP OPEN message to a GoBGP instance may cause capability values to be parsed from outside their declared `CapLen` boundaries. In the 4-octet AS capability case, this may affect: - peer AS validation; - capability negotiation; - interpretation of malformed OPEN messages; - acceptance or rejection decisions during BGP session establishment. This issue does not appear to be arbitrary memory corruption, remote code execution, or information disclosure. It is a protocol parser boundary validation issue that can affect BGP OPEN validation semantics.