GHSA-pfcq-4gjr-6gjm
RustFS: Missing admin authorization on notification target endpoints allows unauthenticated configuration of event webhooks
Packages
Details
As written in the advisory (Markdown source, shown as plain text).
# Missing Admin Auth on Notification Target Endpoints in RustFS
### Finding Summary
All four notification target admin API endpoints in `rustfs/src/admin/handlers/event.rs` use a `check_permissions` helper that validates authentication only (access key + session token), without performing any admin-action authorization via `validate_admin_request`. Every other admin handler in the codebase correctly calls `validate_admin_request` with a specific `AdminAction`. This is the only admin handler file that skips authorization.
A non-admin user can overwrite a shared admin-defined notification target by name, causing subsequent bucket events to be delivered to an attacker-controlled endpoint. This enables cross-user event interception and audit evasion.
### What Was Proven Live
1. **Authorization bypass on all four endpoints** (03_readonly_user_bypass.py)
- PUT, GET list, GET arns, DELETE all return 200 for readonly-user
- Control routes (list-users, kms/status) correctly return 403
- Unauthenticated requests correctly rejected (403 Signature required)
2. **SSRF via health probe** (04_ssrf_listener_landing.py)
- HEAD request from rustfs container to attacker-controlled listener
- No host validation: only scheme check (http/https)
3. **Target hijacking and event exfiltration** (05_target_hijacking.py, 06_full_event_exfil.py)
- Readonly-user overwrites admin-configured target URL by name
- Subsequent S3 events delivered to attacker-controlled endpoint
- Captured event body includes object keys, bucket names, user identities, and request metadata
4. **Audit evasion** (05_target_hijacking.py)
- Readonly-user can delete unbound targets
- Readonly-user can overwrite bound targets (silently redirecting events)
### Escalation Vectors Tested But Not Viable
1. **Self-referencing webhook to admin API** (13_self_referencing_test.py)
- Webhook sends unsigned POST with event JSON body
- Admin endpoints require SigV4 auth -- unsigned request rejected
- "Confused deputy" via self-referencing does NOT work
2. **Protocol smuggling via non-HTTP targets**
- Only 2 target types implemented: webhook and MQTT (`event.rs:613` enforces this)
- No Redis, Kafka, AMQP, or other protocol targets exist
- CRLF injection in webhook config fields sanitized by reqwest
- MQTT uses rumqttc (pure Rust binary protocol client), no raw TCP injection
3. **MQTT target for RCE**
- No unsafe code in MQTT handler
- rumqttc 0.29.0 has no known public CVEs
- No Command::new, template engines, or deserialization of broker responses
4. **Unauth access**
- Endpoints correctly reject unauthenticated requests (403)
- Endpoints correctly reject invalid credentials (403)
### Prior Art
No existing advisory covers notification target endpoints. 11 published GHSAs on rustfs/rustfs cover different handlers. Closest:
- CVE-2026-22042 (ImportIam wrong action constant) -- same bug class, different file
- CVE-2026-22043 (deny_only short-circuit) -- different bug class
### Recommendation
Submit via GitHub PVR. The finding is well-supported with live PoC, code references, and clear root cause. The fix is straightforward (add `validate_admin_request` calls to event.rs handlers). Core submission should reference 2-3 focused PoC scripts (readonly bypass, target hijack, event exfil), not the full set of 13 exploratory scripts.
Koda Reef
### Patch
This issue has been patched in version https://github.com/rustfs/rustfs/releases/tag/1.0.0-alpha.94.
References
External links from the advisory. They lead to third-party sites.