~ / search / GHSA-qx66-fv34-fjm8

GHSA-qx66-fv34-fjm8

TanStack Router: Unauthenticated reflected XSS in TanStack Start server-function responses

Source: GitHub Advisory Database (reviewed) Critical CVE-2026-102989

Packages

EcosystemPackageAffectedFixed in
npm @tanstack/start-server-core >= 1.143.12, < 1.169.39 1.169.39
npm @tanstack/react-start >= 1.143.12, < 1.168.60 1.168.60
npm @tanstack/solid-start >= 1.143.12, < 1.168.57 1.168.57
npm @tanstack/vue-start >= 1.143.12, < 1.168.56 1.168.56

Details

As written in the advisory (Markdown source, shown as plain text).

## Impact An unauthenticated attacker can craft a URL to a server function in an affected TanStack Start app. If someone opens the link, the app can return attacker-controlled HTML from its own origin and run the attacker's JavaScript there. The script can access same-origin data available to that visitor and make requests with their authority. ## Cause The server-function transport can pass request payload fields into internal middleware state instead of limiting them to public input fields. A malformed payload can leave an attacker-controlled result in the error path. Response handling can then treat a response-shaped object as an HTTP response. ## Affected versions Published versions of `@tanstack/start-server-core`, `@tanstack/react-start`, `@tanstack/solid-start`, and `@tanstack/vue-start` from `1.143.12` up to, but not including, their respective patched versions are affected. The patched versions are `@tanstack/[email protected]`, `@tanstack/[email protected]`, `@tanstack/[email protected]`, and `@tanstack/[email protected]`. ## Fix The fix limits client-supplied server-function input to public fields and validates responses at the server boundary. Upgrade to the corresponding patched package version. ## Temporary mitigations For the configured server-function path, usually `/_serverFn/*`, an edge or WAF rule can consider blocking requests without the literal `x-tsr-serverFn: true` header and browser document navigations such as `Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate` or `Accept: text/html`. A restrictive Content Security Policy on server-function responses can provide another browser-side restriction. These are mitigation suggestions, not a complete fix. The header is client-controlled and is not authentication. Test rules against legitimate GET and POST server functions and use a matching version-specific backport where possible. ## Credits Lovable helped us discover and report this issue. We thank them for their help.

References

External links from the advisory. They lead to third-party sites.